Here are some more of the. What do you get if you endlessly recombine Spiderman and the Joker with Elsa from Frozen and lashings of product placement for junk food brands like McDonalds?It features attractions like a 14-foot Big Mac statue, historical memorabilia (including a Big Mac bun-toaster from the 1970s), and, of course, a McDonald’s restaurant. Actual serving size and nutrient values may vary due to factors such as individual preparation of. 'Nutritional values are based on average figures and on standard product formulation.I did a lot of research on the sauce.A lot of views on YouTube, clearly. For Serving: sesame seed buns, butter, shredded lettuce, dill pickles, minced onion, American cheese. For the Burgers: lean ground beef, salt & pepper.
![]() ![]() And that it’s mediums themselves which have the power to enact structural change by reconfiguring how humans act and associate en masse.The mindless cartoon noise mesmerizing kids on YouTube might be the best visual example of that argument yet. And it speaks volumes about the dysfunctional incentives that define the medium.After the latest outcry about disturbing UGC intentionally targeting kids on YouTube, Google has said it will implement new policies to age-restrict this type of content to try to prevent it ending up in the YouTube Kids app, though a prior policy forbidding “inappropriate use of family characters” clearly hasn’t stemmed the low-brow flow of pop-culture soup.The maniacal laughter that appears to be the signature trope of this ‘genre’ at least seems appropriate.McLuhan’s point was that content is intrinsically shaped by the medium through which we obtain it. When IBM discovered that it was not in the business of making office equipment or business machines, but that it was in the business of processing information, then it began to navigate with clear vision.Insofar as kids are concerned, the message being generated via YouTube’s medium is frequently nonsensical a mindless and lurid slurry of endlessly repurposed permutations of pilfered branded content, played out against an eerie blend of childish tunes, giddily repeating nursery rhymes, and crude cartoon sound effects.It’s a literal pantomime of the stuff kids might think to search for. It is only today that industries have become aware of the various kinds of business in which they are engaged. There are in fact very often moral panics associated with new technologies.Which is to be expected as mediums/media are capable of reconfiguring societies at scale. Or purely involve visuals of toys they might crave and pester their parents to buy.Some of this stuff, while hardly original or sophisticated, can at least involve plot and narrative elements (albeit frequently involving gross-out/toilet humor — so it’s also the sort of stuff you might prefer your kids didn’t spend hours watching).And sure there have been moral panics in the past about kids watching hours and hours of TV. (Another hugely popular kids’ content format regularly racking up millions and millions of views on YouTube are toy unboxing videos, for example.) Thereby edging out other, more thoughtful content — given viewing time is finite.Sure, not all the content that’s fishing for children’s eyeballs on YouTube is so cynically constructed as to simply consist of keyword search soup. On the same dysfunctional theme, see also how quickly disinformation spreads between adults on Facebook, another ad-funded, algorithmically organized mega platform whose priorities for content are that it be viral as often as possible.)Where kids are concerned, the structure of the YouTube medium demonstrably rewards pandering to the most calorific of visual cravings. Mcdonalds Big For A Penny 2017 Series Of RepetitiousJunk food transaction scenes. Many videos are just a series of repetitious graphical scenarios designed to combine the culled characters in a mindless set of keyword searchable actions and reactions. (Or rather, in this case, your kid’s eyeballs are — raising questions over whether lots of time spent by kids viewing clickbait might not be to the detriment of their intellectual and social development even if you don’t agree with Bridle’s more pointed assertion that some of this content is so bad as to be being intentionally designed to traumatize children and so, once again looping in the medium, that it represents a systematic form of child abuse.)The worst examples of the regurgitated pop culture slurry that exists on YouTube can’t claim to have even a basically coherent narrative. Extractor for mac iso fileTen minutes of this awful stuff was more than enough to give me nightmares. But it’s hard to imagine anything positive coming from something so intentionally base and bottom-feeding being systematically thrust in front of kids’ eyeballs.And given the content truly has such an empty message to impart it seems logical to read that as a warning about the incentive structures of the underlying medium, as Bridle does.In truth, I did not watch 1,000 hours of YouTube Kids’ content. Kids were learning about proper story structure, at very least.We can’t predict what wider impact a medium that incentivizes factory line production of mindless visual slurry for kids’ consumption might have on children’s development and on society as a whole. But at least such series were entertaining children with well developed, original characters engaged in comic subplots sitting within coherent, creative overarching narratives.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorSarah ArchivesCategories |